Hammilton
08-22-2006, 08:26 PM
Hey, for the first time in, well, maybe ever, I feel like I found a drug that isn't discussed at all, and I'm bringing it up here for discussion. You may have heard of this drug, probably not, but it's unscheduled in the U.S. and schedule V I think in Canada.
Propylhexadrine is an analogue of methamphetamine, but because the phenyl group (as in 'phenyl'ethylamine") is replaced with a cyclohexyl group, it isn't an amphetamine or even a PEA. It still has pronounced stimulant qualities, including euphoria, which from most indications isn't present with ephedrine which is also an analogue of methamphetamine.
In the 50's, after Benzedrine (which is just racemic amphetamine) was removed from Benzedrine inhalers, Propylhexadrine was substituted and was the chemical soaked into the cotton. It is done this way to this day. A Benzedrex (Current brand name) inhaler contains a quarter gram of propylhexadrine.
This also spurred abusers, who noted that the amphetamine-free inhalers still had an amphetamine-like kick to them, did a little research and learned how to crystalize this propylhexadrine (PHI), thus preparing it for injection. Some of them developed brain problems very quickly doing this. Apparently, however, it is still quite safe in the other routes. I haven't seen anything confirming this, however, it was just one doc's opinion.
This might be a potential starting place for meth synthesis, but more to my hopes, it might be the beginning of a line of entirely new stimulants. I'm in the middle of finishing up a bunch of poetry for a publication, halfway through a song I'm collaborating with a guy before he goes back the warm states to work on an album and I might have to do some 'agenting' for my fiance's Photography
(everyone I know who's seen her work agree's that she's amazing, but she's incredibly unsure of herself creatively- after years of learning, practicing and perfecting the art she's still convinced "anyone can do exactly what I do, it's hardly frameable)
because she won't even try to get her work exhibited unless she can get her confidence up some.
I've got a lot to do before I can devote myself to the heavy research that scouring for modifications of PHI that've have been synthesized, tested on rodents, primates, seeing which ones have been tested on humans, what the effects were and then delving into the pharmacology of the interesting ones can really be a bitch. It's hard to a lot of that stuff now, too, because I rely heavily on university professors to guide me and a lot of them aren't checking their emails now.
If anyone is interested I can give you what i've gotten so far. Just start by studying the pharmacology of PHI, and looking at the articles about it and better, analogues of it. Start making a list of authors and their Universities. With good notes the emailing portion is relatively easy.
You can learn fascinating things. A good example is when I was researching a legal XXXXXX derivative with an XXXXXXX action. In the literatures, only XXXXXXX was reported, but the guy who did the research was able to tell me about a slight modification to that chemical produced psychedelic effects. I got tons of research to look through, tons of SSPS datafiles (If you don't have and know how to use SSPS start there). Unfortunately, as 99% of potential drugs end up, it just wasn't suited for human use. The toxicity was just way too high and no one is saying anything about it.
BTW- Please don't ask me for any information about it. I signed a bunch of non-disclosure sorts of things so all I can say is "Sorry, don't know what you're talking about." I can't say the family they were working with or what sort of effect they were looking for with the original chemical. I'm sorry. It's just too good of a resource to mess up.
Hammilton
Propylhexadrine is an analogue of methamphetamine, but because the phenyl group (as in 'phenyl'ethylamine") is replaced with a cyclohexyl group, it isn't an amphetamine or even a PEA. It still has pronounced stimulant qualities, including euphoria, which from most indications isn't present with ephedrine which is also an analogue of methamphetamine.
In the 50's, after Benzedrine (which is just racemic amphetamine) was removed from Benzedrine inhalers, Propylhexadrine was substituted and was the chemical soaked into the cotton. It is done this way to this day. A Benzedrex (Current brand name) inhaler contains a quarter gram of propylhexadrine.
This also spurred abusers, who noted that the amphetamine-free inhalers still had an amphetamine-like kick to them, did a little research and learned how to crystalize this propylhexadrine (PHI), thus preparing it for injection. Some of them developed brain problems very quickly doing this. Apparently, however, it is still quite safe in the other routes. I haven't seen anything confirming this, however, it was just one doc's opinion.
This might be a potential starting place for meth synthesis, but more to my hopes, it might be the beginning of a line of entirely new stimulants. I'm in the middle of finishing up a bunch of poetry for a publication, halfway through a song I'm collaborating with a guy before he goes back the warm states to work on an album and I might have to do some 'agenting' for my fiance's Photography
(everyone I know who's seen her work agree's that she's amazing, but she's incredibly unsure of herself creatively- after years of learning, practicing and perfecting the art she's still convinced "anyone can do exactly what I do, it's hardly frameable)
because she won't even try to get her work exhibited unless she can get her confidence up some.
I've got a lot to do before I can devote myself to the heavy research that scouring for modifications of PHI that've have been synthesized, tested on rodents, primates, seeing which ones have been tested on humans, what the effects were and then delving into the pharmacology of the interesting ones can really be a bitch. It's hard to a lot of that stuff now, too, because I rely heavily on university professors to guide me and a lot of them aren't checking their emails now.
If anyone is interested I can give you what i've gotten so far. Just start by studying the pharmacology of PHI, and looking at the articles about it and better, analogues of it. Start making a list of authors and their Universities. With good notes the emailing portion is relatively easy.
You can learn fascinating things. A good example is when I was researching a legal XXXXXX derivative with an XXXXXXX action. In the literatures, only XXXXXXX was reported, but the guy who did the research was able to tell me about a slight modification to that chemical produced psychedelic effects. I got tons of research to look through, tons of SSPS datafiles (If you don't have and know how to use SSPS start there). Unfortunately, as 99% of potential drugs end up, it just wasn't suited for human use. The toxicity was just way too high and no one is saying anything about it.
BTW- Please don't ask me for any information about it. I signed a bunch of non-disclosure sorts of things so all I can say is "Sorry, don't know what you're talking about." I can't say the family they were working with or what sort of effect they were looking for with the original chemical. I'm sorry. It's just too good of a resource to mess up.
Hammilton