PDA

View Full Version : How to Make a Hash of Calculating Average Pot Potency


Paregoric Kid
06-01-2009, 05:13 PM
How to Make a Hash of Calculating Average Pot Potency

Jacob Sullum (http://www.reason.com/staff/hitandrun/128.html) | June 1, 2009, 5:23pm
A few weeks ago, I noted (http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133498.html) the latest government report about ever-stronger marijuana. "According to the latest data on marijuana samples analyzed to date," the Office of National Drug Control Policy announced (http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/news/press09/051409.html), "the average amount of THC in seized samples has reached a new high of 10.1 percent." But as Bruce Mirken of the Marijuana Policy Project notes (http://blog.mpp.org/research/marijuana-potency-hype-is-fact-checking-dead/05292009/), these samples included hashish (resin) and hash oil (extract), both concentrated forms of cannabis. The average for just marijuana (leaf and buds) was a substantially lower 8.5 percent, up from 8.1 percent (http://www.reason.com/blog/archive/2008-06-15.html) in 2007. A New York Daily News article (http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2009/05/14/2009-05-14_marijuana_potency_not_going_to_pot_drugs_thc_co ncentration_higher_than_ever.html) I quoted made the increase in average THC content look much bigger than that by comparing the 2008 number for marijuana plus hash (10.1 percent) to the 2007 number for what the ONDCP calls "marijuana seizures at Southwest border ports of entry" (7.3 percent).
As I mentioned in my earlier post, it's not clear how representative the samples seized and tested by the government are. Mirken notes that last year "the domestically produced marijuana tested tended to be significantly weaker than the imported stuff, but domestic cannabis only represented 29.7% of the samples tested." By contrast, a 2005 State Department report (http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2005/) cited by Mirken suggests that domestic marijuana represents something like two-thirds of the U.S. market.
Regardless of exactly how much average marijuana potency has increased during the last two decades, of course, the government has yet to give a plausible reason for viewing the trend with alarm (http://www.reason.com/news/show/127058.html).
This year's marijuana potency report is here (http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/pdf/mpmp_report_104.pdf) (PDF); last year's is here (http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/pdf/FullPotencyReports.pdf) (PDF).

nick
06-01-2009, 06:01 PM
yeah,this kinda skewed statistics on cannabis potency were released here and then used to suggest a link between high potency cannabis and increased incidence of psychosis amongst the young.Despite there being no evidence to support this theory.

This was the main reason given for the reclassification of cannabis from a class c drug to a class b drug.

libertine
06-01-2009, 06:17 PM
I saw this British anti-drug advert, and it portrayed teenage marijuana use as being harmful pertaining to its psychedelic effect, the kid was "freaking out" with the paranoia, etc. But I've never noticed this in US anti-weed propaganda, and I've seen a lot

nick
06-01-2009, 06:23 PM
I saw this British anti-drug advert, and it portrayed teenage marijuana use as being harmful pertaining to its psychedelic effect, the kid was "freaking out" with the paranoia, etc. But I've never noticed this in US anti-weed propaganda, and I've seen a lot

Yeah,I believe you're referring to the talk to frank stuff and it's actually anti drug propaganda masquerading as drug education.It's absolute crap and being put out to support this totally unproven theory which has been created to support reclassification.

What's interesting is the government's own impact assessment on this was never released to the public.

OxiContinKing
06-01-2009, 11:33 PM
I saw this British anti-drug advert, and it portrayed teenage marijuana use as being harmful pertaining to its psychedelic effect, the kid was "freaking out" with the paranoia, etc. But I've never noticed this in US anti-weed propaganda, and I've seen a lot

imo, all of the us's anti-weed propaganda are absolute shit. Half of them don't even make sense to your average 15 year old that is smoking pot...

Yeah,I believe you're referring to the talk to frank stuff and it's actually anti drug propaganda masquerading as drug education.It's absolute crap and being put out to support this totally unproven theory which has been created to support reclassification.

What's interesting is the government's own impact assessment on this was never released to the public.

of course, imagine that...