PDA

View Full Version : Damn'it, Now i have to unpack


Neo
05-04-2006, 02:53 AM
In a surprise reversal, Mexican President Vicente Fox (http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news/?p=Vicente+Fox) will not sign a widely criticized reform to decriminalize the possession of small quantities of marijuana, cocaine and heroin, his office said on Wednesday.

The president's office said the law, which also toughened sentences for dealing and holding larger amounts of the intoxicants, would be sent back to Congress for revision.
"In our country the possession of drugs and their consumption are, and will continue to be, crimes," the office said in a statement.

Fox's decision was unexpected, given that the legislation was initially designed by his office and introduced by his party. This week, his spokesman praised the law and insisted the president would quickly sign it, despite rumblings from a shocked Washington.
Mexico argued that the measure set out clearer rules to deal with drug crime, toughened sentences and closed loop-holes. Under present law courts decide on a case-by-case basis whether to act against people who hold drugs.
But the bill allowed for the possession of up to 5 grams (0.18 ounces) of marijuana, 5 grams (0.18 ounces) of opium, 25 milligrams (0.0009 ounces) of heroin and 500 milligrams (0.018 ounces) of cocaine.
It also decriminalized the possession of limited quantities of other drugs, including LSD, hallucinogenic mushrooms, amphetamines and peyote -- a psychotropic cactus found in the Mexican deserts.
Critics, including politicians on both sides of the border, said relaxing the rules so much would attract drug users to Mexico from around the world and complicate its drug war.
Congress passed the legislation last week, dismaying Washington, which counts on its southern neighbor's support in a war against gangs that move massive quantities of cocaine, heroin, marijuana and methamphetamines through Mexico to U.S. consumers.
Hundreds of people, including many police officers, have been killed in Mexico in the past year as drug cartels have battled for control of lucrative smuggling routes.
The violence has raged mostly in northern Mexico, but in recent months has spread south to Pacific coast resorts like Acapulco.
Beleaguered police in the crime-racked Mexican border region warned that the legalization law would make its already chaotic cities rowdier and more unruly. And authorities tourist towns feared the reforms would attract a flood of hard-partying U.S. thrill seekers.
http://forum.opiophile.org/images/icons/badge.gif Fuck U.S. Pressurehttp://forum.opiophile.org/images/icons/badge.gif

katomic
05-04-2006, 06:44 AM
Smells like a washington bribe to me

:violent3:
http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/nucleus/media/5/converted-20041110-bush-finger.jpg :violent3:

Paregoric Kid
05-04-2006, 07:38 AM
it's sad to see that the US has such control over Mexico. the US should stay the fuck out of other countries internal drug affairs.
I think that the bill might only be slightly altered, perhaps to prevent the law from applying to foreigners.
a politician might just as well describe the US drug policy as: GLOBALLY WE SHOULD KEEP STREET LEVEL JUNKIES IN JAIL AND PROMOTE THAT THEY BE INFECTED OF HIV/AIDS AND HEPATITIS! LET'S CONTROL THE FREE MARKET AND TELL PEOPLE WHAT THEY ARE ALLOWED TO SELL AND WHAT CONSUMERS CAN BUY!

jab
05-04-2006, 10:25 AM
According to CNN this morning the law will be re-written to only affect "registered addicts". This means that if your not a registered addict in Mexico allready the law will not apply to you.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/05/04/mexico.drugs.ap/

"The word 'consumer' can be eliminated so that the only exemption clause would be for drug addicts," Zermeno told The Associated Press. "There's still time to get this through."

jacky
05-04-2006, 01:17 PM
depending on what "registering as an addict" entails that may not be such a bad deal. well see if they allow more than 1000 addicts in the whole country to register...

Ive noticed that recently Mexico and the US have been working together and extraditing people who are running pharmacies selling drugs to people without proper prescriptions etc.

exitwound
05-05-2006, 03:19 PM
bloody lovely. :rolleyes:

I knew it was too good to be true.

antony
05-05-2006, 03:29 PM
did anyone really believe it was going to be that easy to get your shit? if they did, they'd have mandatory drug testing at the border, and require a passport. especially all the nonsense with the immigration going on? the borders would be on total lockdown.

Coddfish
05-05-2006, 07:52 PM
Any self-respecting addict (what?) wouldn't waste their time with those amounts. What's the f'n point of that law? Sompin fishy's goin on dere.

poonwhalla
05-05-2006, 07:54 PM
Any self-respecting addict (what?) wouldn't waste their time with those amounts. What's the f'n point of that law? Sompin fishy's goin on dere.

No but I bet they would go back to the same guy over and over again

Paregoric Kid
05-06-2006, 03:35 PM
they are requiring passports for crossing the Mexican and Canadian borders starting in January 2008.
there are no federal intoxication laws that apply to citizens that I know of, except ones that might apply to federal employees and agents.
get real, it would have been impossible for the US to have done anything about it, that was why they were so worried. they can't shut the borders down, it's not going to happen.

the small amount is not the point. it is good because it is a step in the right direction.