Heidi Fleiss fucking up again. Nice mugshot BTW

[WarmCyanide]

she couldnt show proof that the opes were hers. judging by the pic, she doesn't care.

and whoever injected her lips with all of that collagen should either get a job at country crock
or close their practice.

maybe someone should have told her that Art Bell doesn't live in Pahrump anymore.


http://www.lasvegasnow.com/global/Story.asp?s=7839663


http://klas.images.worldnow.com/images/7839663_BG2.jpg

[clinton]

noice pic!

[skank69]

is'nt she a truck stop lot lizard & getting payed well for though's lips :p

[limitless_euphoria]

she couldnt show proof that the opes were hers. judging by the pic, she doesn't care.

http://klas.images.worldnow.com/images/7839663_BG2.jpg

No big surprise there—but that picture—wow! Yeah, she's not giving a shit about very much at the moment. Evidently, she's sportin' that washed up, burned out "Britney Spears-esque" look about her.

When she goes to court I wonder if they'll throw the book at her and give her a whole 5 hours of community service. Also, she might have to hold out her wrist for the judge to slap it ever-so-delicately.

[kyuss]

Who's the dork
with her?

[slugbone]

Who's the dork
with her?


now k-man, sure i don't look too great in that pic but the lighting was terrible!

i was just getting a hot dog and a hummer from ms heidi and got tagged

[kyuss]

now k-man, sure i don't look too great in that pic but the lighting was terrible!

i was just getting a hot dog and a hummer from ms heidi and got tagged


:D

like I'm one
to judge.
I ain't no
Johnny Depp.

[chinaski]

damn who the fuck drives around nevada all fucked up with no license, pills and pot? I guess heidi fliess + one dork. nevada scares the fuck outta me, zeeerooo tolerance.

btw doesn't she look like the joker with no makeup?

[GOLD N DIEMONDS]

now k-man, sure i don't look too great in that pic but the lighting was terrible!

i was just getting a hot dog and a hummer from ms heidi and got tagged

DAMN YOU'RE FUNNY! a hotdog and hummer please - :D

[kyuss]

damn who the fuck drives around nevada all fucked up with no license, pills and pot? I guess heidi fliess + one dork. nevada scares the fuck outta me, zeeerooo tolerance.

btw doesn't she look like the joker with no makeup?


Frogman is gonna
kick yer ass.
He does look dorky there
though,doesn't he?

[pharmboy]

She Kinda looks like some of your avitars a while back WC.

[Raz]

Just gotta state the obvious,...That chic if fucking ugly.Who's got the biggest lips, her or slugbones avatar? I bet she can give some serious head wiv those smackers,.
Didnt she have some shit wiv actor a little while back..Someone well known to use opi's?...You gotta be doin a lot of shit to be lookin that fucked up..Her perception is way off key...Grotesque....

[southernbelle]

As the first girl to post on this, may I say: EEWWWWW!!! Heidi! Damn, girl!!

[reddragon3668]

Now, that is one ugggggLY chick! I wouldn't mind having some of whatever she's on, not the lip pump, but she looks wasted. I wonder if she's in Vegas turning tricks? If so, she's going broke. LOL

[WarmCyanide]

damn who the fuck drives around nevada all fucked up with no license, pills and pot? I guess heidi fliess + one dork. nevada scares the fuck outta me, zeeerooo tolerance.

btw doesn't she look like the joker with no makeup?


didn't even realize that point about her getting pinched in Nevada.


from the Reno Gazette 2003:


8/30/2003 09:45 pm
By Martha Bellisle
RENO GAZETTE-JOURNAL
Too many drivers high on drugs are causing fatal crashes while avoiding prosecution, say federal officials who are calling for new laws nationwide that would send a driver to prison without proving drugs caused the accident.
The new legislation, to be modeled after statutes recently passed in Nevada and eight other states, would make it illegal for drivers to have drugs, including marijuana, in their systems.
Under these laws, prosecutors don't have to prove that the drugs impacted the driver's ability to stay on the road. They simply must show the drugs were in the driver's body.
A positive test could mean a 20-year sentence for each count.
Two Reno drivers and one woman from Las Vegas who face decades in prison after being involved in fatal accidents and testing positive for marijuana are challenging the law in court. Their success or failure could affect legislation across the country.
"The intent (of the law) was to make sure that if someone was driving under the influence of a controlled substance, they would be held responsible for loss of life," said U.S. Rep. Jon Porter, R-Nev., who sponsored Nevada's prohibited substance drug bill in 1999 while a state senator.
But critics of Nevada's law, including toxicologists, lawyers, civil libertarians and some lawmakers, say the statue is unfair and unconstitutional because it does not require proof that the driver was actually impaired by the drugs.
And, they say, the cut-off levels for the drugs listed in the statute are so small that impairment would be unlikely in many circumstances.
This means that a person who uses marijuana at a party on Saturday night could test positive when in an accident on Monday, days after the drugs were taken, critics say. That's because unlike alcohol, some drugs can stay in a person's system for a long time.
"People are going to prison for smoking a joint a day or two or three ago," said John Watkins, a Las Vegas lawyer for one of three Nevadans currently charged under the law.
"The whole idea of driving under the influence is driving under the influence," he said. "But we're putting people in prison who are not impaired."
Last year, Watkins challenged the law in the Nevada Supreme Court. But the justices upheld the statute, saying: "the governmental interest in maintaining safe highways is sufficient for our prohibited substance statute to survive a constitutional attackâ"
Despite the high court's ruling, Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani, D-Las Vegas, is determined to overhaul the law.
She and two other lawmakers, Bernie Anderson, D-Sparks and Marcus Conklin, D-Las Vegas, introduced a bill during the last session that would increase the statute's allowable amounts of marijuana in an attempt to measure impairment, not just the presence of drug.
They plan to bring it back in 2005.



i cant find the current nevada marijuana/narcotic possession laws. just alot of medical use sites.

anyone know the amount of MJ in Nevada that makes it a felony?

[reddragon3668]

That has got to be the craziest thing I've ever seen! That means that a CP patient, being medicated with extended release meds, could get into an accident, possibly one that was not their fault, and be held liable simply because of the presence of a known mind altering substance. It doesn't seem to take into consideration the fact that the impairing side effects of these medicines often go away with prolonged use. That really is some scary shit!

I agree with the attorney; it does seem that it misses the point. If I smoke a joint today and get in a wreck next friday, more than likely I will test positive for MJ. But, I certainly could not still be under its "influence." I know that is redundant, but my God, that has got to be the most ridiculous law I've ever heard of. I'm sure glad I don't live in Nevada. I bet there are allot of people in that state that drive in fear every day of their lives! The state or any government should not ever have that kind of power. Twenty years for causing a death in an accident, operative word being "accident!"

I better shut up now.. that's got my blood pressure up.... where's my pills????? LOL

[eerased]

She looks like a cartoon in that Pic. Dam she's been threw the ringer more than twice!